![]() That oath required public employees to deny any past affiliation with such organizations. 216 (1952), the Court held that Oklahoma's loyalty oath offended due process because it indiscriminately penalized innocent association or membership in Communist or other subversive groups. Some loyalty oath statutes have been invalidated on the ground that they unconstitutionally infringe on freedom of association. In declaring a New York loyalty statute unconstitutionally vague, the Court in Keyishian called academic freedom a "special concern of the First Amendment." It also expressed its belief that loyalty statutes that attempt to prescribe what a teacher can say threaten to "cast a pall of orthodoxy over the classroom." The Court expressed a particular interest in protecting Academic Freedom from infringements imposed by loyalty oaths, in Keyishian v. The Court found further that it violated due process and infringed on the teachers' Freedom of Speech. The Court held that the oath was unduly vague, uncertain, and broad. This oath stated that the employee promised to support the federal and state constitutions and promote respect for the flag and reverence for law and order. 2d 377 (1964), the Court invalidated Washington's statute requiring teachers and state employees to take a loyalty oath. Most loyalty oaths required of public employees have been struck down by the Supreme Court, usually on the ground that they violate due process because they are vague and susceptible to wide interpretation. Some also required teachers to promise to promote patriotism, pledge not to teach or advocate the forcible overthrow of the government, and swear that they did not belong to the Communist party or any other organization that advocated the overthrow of the government. Most of the statutes required employees to pledge their support of the state and federal constitutions. Under some of the statutes, schools were permitted to discharge teachers who were thought to be disloyal to the government. Thus the majority of states enacted statutes that required public employees, public school teachers, and university professors to sign a loyalty oath as a condition of employment. There was particular concern that Communist sympathizers were obtaining employment in the government and in public schools. Fear of Communist subversion affected many aspects of life in the United States. The period after World War II was the high-water mark in the history of loyalty oaths. One statute that required an oath of prior loyalty for Admission to the Bar was found unconstitutional because it imposed a legislative punishment for past acts. For example, after the Civil War, some states enacted statutes that excluded from certain professions those who had been disloyal to the United States and had sympathized with the Confederacy. Loyalty oaths are often invoked during times of stress, such as wars, or when the government perceives an outside threat to security. To ensure unity the Continental Congress and the legislatures of the first states all enacted laws requiring citizens to pledge their allegiance to the U.S. The Puritans in New England required citizens to pledge their support of the commonwealth and to report any individuals who advocated dissent against the government. Loyalty oaths have played a role in American history since the settlement of the colonies. If an oath is overly broad or vague, it may be found unconstitutional. Loyalty oaths that infringe on a person's ability to exercise a constitutional right must be narrowly focused to achieve a legitimate government objective. Requiring an employee to promise to support the government as a condition of employment is constitutional as long as the requirement is reasonably related to the employee's fitness for the particular position. ![]() Employees in sensitive government positions may also be required to take a loyalty oath. Naturalized citizens are required to pledge their allegiance to the United States, as are members of the Armed Services. Loyalty oaths are required of government officials, such as the president, members of Congress and state legislatures, and members of the judiciary. ![]() An oath that declares an individual's allegiance to the government and its institutions and disclaims support of ideologies or associations that oppose or threaten the government.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |